vero beach 32963 - vero beachside newspaper
Volume 1, Edition 1.2
Serving the beachside residents and businesses of Vero Beach
Last Updated: 09/28/2008
(c) 2008 All Rights Reserved
Vero Beach oceanside newspaper • advertising to go here • Vero Beach beachside newspaper
Site Index
Beachside Dining
Fine Dining
Casual Dining
Lounges
..
Mainland Dining
Fine Dining
Casual Dining
Restaurant Chains
Lounges
..

 

Vero Beach 32963 Reviews
Monte's: Mostly good, but mostly isn't good enough

Late News Bulletin: Monte's restaurant unexpectedly shut down following dinner July 13th, and it is unclear whether it will reopen..

by Tina Rondeau

A long time staple on the Vero beachside restaurant scene has been Monte’s on South Beach, which has always had its fans but which we for many years thought was overpriced and overrated. But we had not been back since it changed ownership four years ago, so we decided to check in and see whether things have changed for the better.

On the whole, they appear to have improved (but with an asterisk we will get to later). The evening at this traditional Italian restaurant got off to a promising start when the four of us were promptly seated (not always the case in the past) on arrival for our 7 p.m. reservation.

Monte’s appears to do a strong early business, because the restaurant was nearly full when we came. But it began clearing out around 9, and by 10 on a Saturday night, only a couple of parties lingered at their tables.

Our server quickly arrived with a basket of warm Italian bread to take our drink order. Monte’s has always boasted that it has the most extensive wine list in Vero Beach (which may well be true) but it offers relatively few modestly priced selections. We ordered a $35 bottle (which ultimately cloned itself) adding $70 to the bill for a couple of glasses of an okay wine.

For appetizers, we started with stuffed mushrooms ($8.95) and baked clams oregano ($8.95). The mushrooms, served in a bordelaise sauce, were quite dry (even spooning the sauce over them didn’t save this dish). The baked clams oregano, however, were well prepared and very tasty.

While Monte’s offers a variety of salads including the traditional Caesar, house salads are included in price of all entrees , and they turned out to be more-than-adequate mixed salads served with a variety of dressings.

The entrees were where Monte’s came close to living up to the raves of its fans. I had the Shrimp Scampi ($23.95), and the very nice shrimp were served in one of the tastiest butter, wine, lemon and garlic sauces that I have enjoyed recently. My companion had the Veal Sofia ($22.95), an excellent rendition of veal scaloppini with sautéed shallots and wild mushrooms, served in a wonderful amarone reduction sauce.

The other couple dining with us tried two chicken dishes – the Chicken Napalitano ($19.95) and the Chicken Parmigiana ($18.95). The chicken in both dishes was very tender and cooked perfectly. The Chicken Napalitano, chicken breast topped with prosciutto, roasted peppers, sliced tomators and mozzarella cheese, was a big hit, and our other friend raved about the Chicken Parmigiana .

Now for the asterisk. All dishes except pasta entrees come with a side of pasta, which on this night was penne in a heavy, cloying tomato sauce. Beyond the fact that the penne was clearly overcooked, the sauce had a strangely bitter taste noted by all four of us.

When we brought this to the attention of the otherwise very good waiter, he apparently despaired of improving the dishes because instead of offering to replace the pasta sides, he asked if we would like to have him take them away.

While this left us with a bit of a sour aftertaste, an excellent Tiramisu ($7.95) accompanied by an espresso ($3.50) came close to saving the night. But when the check for four is $195 before tip, diners have a right to expect all the dishes to be cooked properly, and when you point out a flaw to the waiter, you are entitled to expect the restaurant to take steps to make you happy.

Neither of those occurred at Monte’s, and despite the excellent entrees, we cannot agree with those who believe this belongs in the top tier of Vero Beach restaurants. I welcome your comments. Send them to tina@verobeach32963.com.

The reviewer is a beachside resident who dines anonymously at restaurants at the expense of Vero Beach 32963.


UPDATE: Subsequent to publication of this review in our June 1 print edition, our reviewer received the email below from "Jonathan," who expressed the belief he was the waiter referenced in the article.

Ms Rondeau says: "While I am not sure that Jonathan was indeed my waiter, and the overcooked pasta was first and foremost a kitchen problem, I feel we should print this very impressive response that does credit to both the waiter and the restaurant."


From Jonathan : "My comments here are in response to your review of Monte's Restaurant in the June 1st issue of Vero Beach 32963 weekly.

"I am certain I was your server for the evening. First, I must agree with you that I was indeed negligent when I failed to offer alternatives for the side pastas that your party found unsatisfactory that evening. I pride myself in being a professional and accomplished server. I made an "executive decision" based on the timing of your evening. The decision was yours to make, not mine. You should have been given options. My apologies to you and your guests. It is a learning experience for a professional waiter.

"My concern is a fine restaurant with an accomplished owner, management and staff has been publicly evaluated based on one server's isolated error in judgment on a particular evening. Far too many patrons of Monte's from New York City, Boston, and Chicago and parts around the world,as well as Vero Beach, have raved about the freshness and quality of our dishes and quality of our service. I am proud to be on staff and have apologized to all at Monte's for the negative attention I have brought them.

"I hope to have the opportunity to serve you again."

Advertisements
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

 

For Advertising Info
Contact Us